Article

Review Article

Clinical use of PET/CT in thyroid cancer diagnosis and management

FX Sundram*, MBBCh, DMRT

Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT Centre, Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia

ABSTRACT

The incidence of thyroid cancer is low, but when it occurs, it is mainly of the papillary histopathological type. Although PET/CT has a limited role in the diagnosis, it plays a significant role in the overall post-surgery management of a patient with thyroid cancer. This follow-up role is important, especially in patients with elevated serum thyroglobulin, but negative radioiodine whole body scans. There is increasing evidence that PET/CT should be a part of routine care in the Tg positive Radioiodine scan negative patient. © 2006 Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Thyroid cancer, thyroglobulin, radioiodine scan, PET/CT

INTRODUCTION

Thyroid cancer is an uncommon disease, with a yearly incidence of about 40 out of 100,000 in women and 15 out of 100,000 in men. The majority of thyroid cancers are of the differentiated type, mainly papillary, and to a lesser extent follicular cancer. For early diagnosis of thyroid cancer, Ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules is important. Scanning with Tc-99m pertechnetate, Tc-99m sestamibi or tetrofosmin and Thallium-201 Chloride, may help in some cases [1]. The use of 18 F- fluorodeoxyglucose to assess thyroid nodules is still under consideration [2]. Choi et al [3] found focal thyroid lesion in 4% of PET/CT scans, with maximum SUV of malignant thyroid lesions to be significantly higher than that of benign lesions. The cancer risk of focal thyroid lesions was found to be 39%.

Age, sex, tumour stage, and histopathological grading have prognostic significance. Total thyrodectomy is the treatment of choice for differentiated thyroid cancer, and the procedure includes lymph-node dissection of the central compartment. Radioiodine treatment usually follows thyroidectomy, to ablate benign thyroid remnants and destroy remaining malignant cells. Follow-up with serum thyroglobulin levels, sonography of the thyroid bed, and radioiodine scintigraphy is essential, especially to detect local recurrence or distant metastases [4]. There is good correlation between the Tg levels (in the absence of thyroglobulin autoantibody) and persistence of disease. In most cases, undetectable Tg levels suggest absence of either thyroid tissue or distant metastases [4,5]. An elevated serum Tg suggests disease and is usually associated with an abnormal I-131 WBS, with either local recurrence or distant metastases. However, discordant results between I-131 WBS and serum thyroglobulin have been encountered. In particular, approximately 15 to 20% of patients with high serum Tg have negative I-131 diagnostic WBS [5,6]. These false-negative scans may be due to the low dose of iodine administered (diagnostic dose), presence of tumour deposits too small to be detected by a gamma camera, or loss of iodine concentration as a result of tumour dedifferentiation, with impaired sodium-iodide symporter (NIS) system or impaired TSH receptor stimulation. Several recent studies have shown that fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) can be used to detect local recurrence and distant metastases of thyroid carcinoma, especially in those patients who present with high serum Tg, but negative I-131 WBS [6-8].

Serum Thyroglobulin (Tg) and Radionuclide scans in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC)

The follow-up of patients treated for DTC usually includes clinical monitoring, serum thyroglobulin measurements, radionuclide imaging, and anatomic imaging (ultrasonography and CT scans) when indicated. Both Tg measurements and radionuclide imaging rely on TSH stimulation for higher sensitivity. The serum Tg under TSH stimulation (after stopping thyroid hormone for four to six weeks or after two intramuscular injections of recombinant TSH (rhTSH)) is a good indicator of persistent or recurrent disease [8]. The Tg level is reliable only if Tg antibodies are undetectable and recovery of Tg is in the normal range. If high-risk and low-risk groups are differentiated, the consensus is that for low-risk group in complete remission, ultrasonography of the neck and rhTSH stimulated Tg are sufficient for further follow-up [9].

For high-risk patients, many centres perform radioiodine I-131 scans, with Tg under TSH stimulation. The specificity of I-131 whole body scans (WBS) is high, but the sensitivity is low [10]. Radioiodine therapy necessitated by rising Tg levels has a therapeutic effect, and the post-therapy WBS has a higher sensitivity compared with a low-dose diagnostic scan [11]. In some patients, there is elevation of TSH-stimulated Tg, but the diagnostic I-131 WBS is negative. Explanations for false negative WBS could be iodine contamination, insufficient TSH stimulation, small tumour volume, or iodine negative metastases [12]. FDG PET/CT should be considered if the last two reasons are likely. Other tracers, such as, Technetium-99m sestamibi may be used for WBS, especially for soft tissue/nodal disease [13].

PET/CT in the follow-up of thyroid cancer

Using FDG-PET imaging Feine et al. [14] noted that differentiated tumours with iodine avidity have low glucose metabolism in most patients, with the converse also being true, indicating that high glucose metabolism signifies poor tumour differentiation and higher possible malignant potential. The diagnostic sensitivity of FDG-PET and I-31 WBS combined was found to be 95%. I-131 negative, but FDG-positive or I-131 positive and FDG negative scan was found in 90% of the patients. Examples of this ‘flip-flop’ phenomenon are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2.

[View this figure]

Figure 1 I-131 positive scan with negative PET scan.

[View this figure]

Figure 2 Negative I-131 scan in patient with lung metastasis on CT and PET scans.

FDG-PET has been advocated as a monitoring procedure for patients with:

1. High-risk disease
2. Adverse histology (e.g., columnar cell, tall cell, and insular variants)
3. Rising Tg levels with no known anatomic source
4. Hurthle cell carcinoma

FDG-PET has also been recommended for post-treatment response assessment, lesion dosimetry, and evaluation of the thyroid nodule, but not recommended for determining extent of disease in low-risk cases.

FDG-PET scans are most useful in ‘high-risk’ patients, wherein tumours are more biologically aggressive, and for metastatic disease. Apart from aiding in diagnosis, PET measurement of glucose metabolism provides biologic information, as noted in the standardised uptake value (SUV). Patients whose cancers take up FDG well are not likely to respond to radioactive iodine. Furthermore, the PET-FDG SUV is a strong predictor of adverse prognosis, with higher SUV’s indicating worse overall prognosis [15].

The usefulness of FDG-PET may depend on factors, such as, Tg level, TSH stimulation by thyroid hormone withdrawal, and TSH stimulation by rhTSH administration. In a study by Schluter et al [16], positive FDG-PET scan results were achieved in 11% of patients with Tg levels of 10ng/ml or less; this increased to 50% among patients with Tg levels between 10 to 20 ng/ml and to 93% at Tg levels above 100ng/ml.

Patients should generally stop thyroid hormone treatment prior to PET scanning. TSH stimulation could be either via hormone withdrawal or by injection of rhTSH. In a study by Petrich et al [17], the sensitivity of FGD-PET was 53% during TSH suppression and 87% following rhTSH stimulation. Their conclusion was that rhTSH FDG-PET suggested specific therapeutic interventions in 57% of patients, with surgery indicated in 23%.

With the introduction of PET/CT imaging for cancer, questions arise as to whether PET/CT imaging is superior to PET and CT alone, and does PET/CT improve patient management compared with both modalities alone. PET can be considered functional (metabolism), while CT mainly reflects anatomy. In combined PET/CT the CT data are used for attenuation correction and anatomic localisation. There is no consensus yet on whether the CT should be done as contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT or as low-dose CT for anatomic correlation. Generally the PET/CT scans are done without contrast, as the SUV values are altered by contrast, which also reduces I-131 uptake when the treatment dose is given. Early clinical results of PET/CT fusion imaging indicate that the exact localisation of hypermetabolic lesions leads to better reliability of results and higher diagnostic confidence, compared with each imaging modality alone [18,19]. In general, for staging and restaging of various tumours, there is additional information in about 45% of patients and change in management in 15% of patients using PET/CT fusion imaging [20]. Furthermore, pitfalls of PET, such as, normal structures in head and neck region, bowel activity, muscle activity, renal excretion, ureteric activity, and brown fat tissue could be reduced by using PET/CT [20].

In our study of thyroid cancer patients with elevated Tg, but negative I-131 WBS, lesions were found in 15 out of 17 patients consistent with metastases, resulting in 88% sensitivity [21]. Nahas et al [22] report a PET/CT sensitivity of 66% in identifying recurrent disease, with a specificity of 100% and a positive predictive value of 100%. These authors conclude that PET/CT is most useful in the detection and the management of recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma in patients with average Tg levels greater than 10ng/ml. A more recent study by Palmedo et al [23] using PET/CT in patients with suspected iodine-negative differentiated thyroid carcinoma, showed diagnostic accuracy of 93% for PET/CT and 78% for PET alone. They also noted that in tumour positive PET patients, the PET/CT fusion imaging led to a change of therapy in 48% of the patients.

The Centres for Medicare and Medicaid Services (USA) began coverage of FDG-PET procedure in October 2003, for restaging of recurrent or residual thyroid cancer of follicular cell origin that has previously been treated by thyroidectomy and radioiodine ablation in patients with serum Tg levels of 10ng/ml or greater and negative I-131 WBS.

Early this year, the American Thyroid Association produced an excellent set of Management Guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer [24]. They recommended that if an empiric dose (100 to 200 mCi) of radioiodine fails to localise persistent disease, FDG-PET should be considered, especially in patients with unstimulated serum thyroglobulin levels more than 10 to 20 ng/ml.

Iodine-124 PET/CT

Iodine-124 produced in a clinical cyclotron facility can be used to identify mediastinal micrometastases in thyroid carcinoma [25]. Freudenberg et al [26] reported that Iodine-124 PET/CT imaging is a promising technique to improve treatment planning in thyroid cancer. It appears likely that I-124 PET/CT may have an important role for individualised dosimetry in patients with metastatic thyroid cancer [27]. Although I-124 is available in only a few hospitals worldwide, it is an ideal tracer for dosimetry. The treatment dose with Iodine -131 can be planned based on the dosimetric studies done with PET/CT using I-124, especially because the spatial resolution of the PET camera is better than the gamma-camera images using I-131 (Divgi, personal communication).

1. Sundram FX, Mack P. Evaluation of thyroid nodules for malignancy using 99Tcm-sestamibi. Nucl Med Commun 1995;16(8):687-93.   [Medline]
   
2. Mitchell JC, Grant F, Evenson AR, et al. Preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodules with 18FDG-PET/CT. Surgery 2005;138(6):1166-74; discussion 1174-5.   [Medline] [CrossRef]
   
3. Choi JY, Lee KS, Kim HJ, et al. Focal thyroid lesions incidentally identified by integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT: clinical significance and improved characterization. J Nucl Med 2006;47(4):609-15.   [Medline]
   
4. Sherman SI. Thyroid carcinoma. Lancet 2003;361(9356):501-11.   [Medline]
   
5. Menendez Torre E, Lopez Carballo MT, Rodriguez Erdozain RM, et al. Prognostic value of thyroglobulin serum levels and 131I whole-body scan after initial treatment of low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2004;14(4):301-6.   [Medline] [CrossRef]
   
6. Baudin E, Do Cao C, Cailleux AF, et al. Positive predictive value of serum thyroglobulin levels, measured during the first year of follow-up after thyroid hormone withdrawal, in thyroid cancer patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88(3):1107-11.   [Medline]
   
7. Wang W, Macapinlac H, Larson SM, et al. [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography localizes residual thyroid cancer in patients with negative diagnostic (131)I whole body scans and elevated serum thyroglobulin levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84(7):2291-302.   [Medline]
   
8. Pacini F. Follow up of differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 2002;(suppl 2):S492-6.  
   
9. Schlumberger M, Berg G, Cohen O, et al. Follow-up of low-risk patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a European perspective. Eur J Endocrinol 2004;150(2):105-12.   [Medline]
   
10. Filesi M, Signore A, Ventroni G, et al. Role of initial iodine-131 whole-body scan and serum thyroglobulin in differentiated thyroid carcinoma metastases. J Nucl Med 1998;39(9):1542-6.   [Medline]
    
11. Pace L, Klain M, Albanese C, et al. Short-term outcome of differentiated thyroid cancer patients receiving a second iodine-131 therapy on the basis of a detectable serum thyroglobulin level after initial treatment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33(2):179-83.   [Medline] [CrossRef]
    
12. Ma C, Kuang A, Xie J, et al. Possible explanations for patients with discordant findings of serum thyroglobulin and 131I whole-body scanning. J Nucl Med 2005;46(9):1473-80.   [Medline]
    
13. Ng DC, Sundram FX, Sin AE. 99mTc-sestamibi and 131I whole-body scintigraphy and initial serum thyroglobulin in the management of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2000;41(4):631-5.   [Medline]
    
14. Feine U, Lietzenmayer R, Hanke JP, et al. Fluorine-18-FDG and iodine-131-iodide uptake in thyroid cancer. J Nucl Med 1996;37(9):1468-72.   [Medline]
    
15. Larson SM, Robbins R. Positron emission tomography in thyroid cancer management. Semin Roentgenol 2002;37(2):169-74.   [Medline]
    
16. Schluter B, Bohuslavizki KH, Beyer W, et al. Impact of FDG PET on patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who present with elevated thyroglobulin and negative 131I scan. J Nucl Med 2001;42(1):71-6.   [Medline]
    
17. Petrich T, Borner AR, Otto D, et al. Influence of rhTSH on [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29(5):641-7.   [Medline] [CrossRef]
    
18. Burger I, Gorres G, von Shulthess G, et al. PET/CT : diagnostic improvement in recurrent colorectal carcinoma compared to PET alone. Radiology 2002;225:S424.  
    
19. Schoder H, Erdi YE, Larson SM, et al. PET/CT: a new imaging technology in nuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30(10):1419-37.   [Medline] [CrossRef]
    
20. Lind P, Kohlfurst S. Respective roles of thyroglobulin, radioiodine imaging, and positron emission tomography in the assessment of thyroid cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2006;36(3):194-205.   [Medline] [CrossRef]
    
21. Ong SC, Ng DC, Sundram FX. Initial experience in use of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in thyroid carcinoma patients with elevated serum thyroglobulin but negative iodine-131 whole body scans. Singapore Med J 2005;46(6):297-301.   [Medline]
    
22. Nahas Z, Goldenberg D, Fakhry C, et al. The role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of recurrent papillary thyroid carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2005;115(2):237-43.   [Medline]
    
23. Palmedo H, Bucerius J, Joe A, et al. Integrated PET/CT in differentiated thyroid cancer: diagnostic accuracy and impact on patient management. J Nucl Med 2006;47(4):616-24.   [Medline]
    
24. Freudenberg LS, Antoch G, Gorges R, et al. Combined PET/CT with Iodine-124 in diagnosis of mediastinal micrometastases in Thyroid Carninoma. The Internet Journal of Radiology 2002;2(2).  
    
25. Freudenberg LS, Antoch G, Jentzen W, et al. Value of (124)I-PET/CT in staging of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur Radiol 2004;14(11):2092-8.   [Medline] [CrossRef]
    
26. Sgouros G, Kolbert KS, Sheikh A, et al. Patient-specific dosimetry for 131I thyroid cancer therapy using 124I PET and 3-dimensional-internal dosimetry (3D-ID) software. J Nucl Med 2004;45(8):1366-72.   [Medline]
    
27. Singer PA, Cooper DS, Daniels GH, et al. Treatment guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and well-differentiated thyroid cancer. American Thyroid Association. Arch Intern Med 1996;156(19):2165-72.   [Medline]
    

Leave a comment

Full name *
Email *
Affiliation
Please select ... Abkhazia Afghanistan Aland Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Ascension Ashmore and Cartier Islands Australia Australian Antarctic Territory Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas, The Bahrain Baker Island Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Antarctic Territory British Indian Ocean Territory British Sovereign Base Areas British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China, People's Republic of China, Republic of (Taiwan) Christmas Island Clipperton Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Cook Islands Coral Sea Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast) Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern and Antarctic Lands Gabon Gambia, The Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Honduras Hong Kong Howland Island Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jarvis Island Jersey Johnston Atoll Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kingman Reef Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia Midway Islands Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar (Burma) Nagorno-Karabakh Namibia Nauru Navassa Island Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Cyprus Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territories Palmyra Atoll Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Peter I Island Philippines Pitcairn Islands Poland Portugal Pridnestrovie (Transnistria) Puerto Rico Qatar Queen Maud Land Reunion Romania Ross Dependency Russia Rwanda S. Georgia and the S. Sandwich Islands Saint Barthelemy Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia Somaliland South Africa South Ossetia Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Timor-Leste (East Timor) Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tristan da Cunha Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu U.S. Virgin Islands Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vatican City Venezuela Vietnam Wake Island Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Country *

Password *