Biomed Imaging Interv J 2006; 2(4):e42
doi: 10.2349/biij.2.4.e42
© 2006 Biomedical Imaging and
Intervention Journal
Case Report
Degenerated uterine fibroid mimicking hydrametra: fallacy in CT
CH Tok1,*, MD, MRad,
SI Bux1, MD, MRad,
SI Mohamed1, MBBS, MRad,
BK Lim2 MBBS, FRCOG
1 Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of
Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2 Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine,
University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

ABSTRACT
Fibroids are the commonest uterine neoplasms, occurring in
20% - 30% of women of reproductive age. In women who have pelvic masses of
unknown cause, unusual manifestations of fibroids such as necrosis or
degeneration may simulate a carcinoma or hydrometra resulting in problems with
image interpretation. We report a case of an unsuspected large degenerated
uterine fibroid in a lady mistakenly diagnosed as hydrometra on computed
tomography scanning. � 2006 Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal. All
rights reserved.
Keywords: CT, Fibroids, hydrometra

Case Report
A 34-year-old nulliparous woman presented with sudden onset
of severe abdominal pain and a six months history of progressive abdominal
swelling. Her menstruation cycle was normal and regular.� 5 years prior to
admission she had undergone a right oophorectomy for a benign mucinous
cystadenoma.� On admission she was pale (Hb 9.4g/dl) with a large firm, tender
and fixed pelvic mass corresponding to 36-week gravid uterus. Urine pregnancy
test and serum tumour markers were negative. A clinical diagnosis of twisted
ovarian cyst was made.
Contrast enhanced spiral CT scan of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis revealed
an enlarged lobulated uterus with a large (17.1 x 16.0 x 20
cm) fairly oval central hypodense lesion (30 � 70 HU) stretching
the myometrium (Figure 1). In addition, there were several enhancing
oval lesions noted in the lower uterine wall and a separate
smaller inhomogeneously enhancing lesion (6.2 x 5.1 x 10 cm)
in the right adnexa. The cervix was normal. There were no para-aortic,
pelvic or inguinal lymphadenopathy and no ascites. The liver,
spleen, pancreas and kidneys were normal. A diagnosis of a hydrometra
with a right adnexal pathology was made.
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the pelvis was performed
to determine the cause of endocervical canal obstruction. It showed an enlarged
uterine outline with 2 masses; a large left mass occupying almost the entire
anterior wall of the uterus with compression and displacement of the
endometrium posteriorly (Figure 2), and a smaller right mass. Both masses
showed areas of high signal intensity on the T2WI, homogeneous low signal
intensity on the T1WI and peripheral wall enhancement on the post-Gadolinium
DTPA T1-weighted images (Figure 3). Features were consistent with that of
degenerating fibroids.
Retrospective 3D multiplanar reformation (MPR) of the CT
dataset, confirmed the MRI findings. In addition numerous blood vessels were
noted in the posterior uterine wall supplying the lesions (Figure 4).
Patient had total abdominal hysterectomy following failure
of a trial of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues. Laparotomy
confirmed multiple large uterine fibroids. Histopathological examination showed
well-circumscribed fibroids with large areas of necrosis and hyalinisation with
surrounding inflammation. The endocervical glands and the endometrium were
normal. A diagnosis of multiple fibroids with a large degenerated component was
made. Patient recovered well.

DISCUSSION
Fibroids are classified as submucosal, intramural or
subserosal based on their location. Intramural fibroids are within the
substance of the myometrium and are the most common type but often
asymptomatic. It has been estimated that 20%-50% of women with fibroids present
with symptoms such as menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, pressure, urinary frequency,
pain, infertility, or a palpable abdominal / pelvic mass [1]. Pain occurs in
approximately 30% of women with uterine fibroids and is usually the result of
acute degeneration [1]. Degeneraton in fibroids, which occurs secondary to
inadequate blood supply, may be hyaline (commonest), myxomatous, cystic, fatty,
haemorrhagic or malignant in nature. The type of degenerative change seems to
depend on the degree and rapidity of the onset of vascular insufficiency. GnRH
analogues affect only undegenerated fibroids, and are ineffective when there is
degeneration [2] as was noted in our patient
Even though fibroids are often found incidentally on CT, it
is not the primary modality for diagnosing or evaluating fibroids. The common
CT features include; uterine enlargement with a lobulated outer contour, focal
myometrial thickening, deformed endometrial cavity, foci of punctate or
amorphous coarse calcifications, and abnormal density within the soft tissue
mass [3].� A fibroid may be hypodense, isodense or hyperdense relative to
normal contrast-enhanced myometrium on CT scanning. Hyaline degeneration may be
accompanied by varying degree of liquefaction thus resulting in a more cystic
appearance [4] as was noted in our patient. A parasitized blood supply from an
enlarged uterine artery may be responsible for the rare �hyperdense� fibroid
[3].� Fast volume scanning in CT enables gapless data acquisition and
overlapping images, thus increasing spatial resolution and reducing
partial-volume averaging. 3D MPR enables display of a section of organs in a
coronal or sagittal projection and thus depicting the anatomical structures
more precisely hence reducing misinterpretation.
Other differential diagnoses of a hypodense lesion in the
uterus on CT include leiomyosarcoma and hydrometra. Leiomyosarcoma occur in
less than 1% of all cases and is impossible to distinguish it from a benign
degenerating fibroid on imaging [5]. Hydrometra on CT appears as a symmetrically
enlarged uterus, with a low-attenuation, non-enhancing central mass [6] while
submocosal fibroids may asymmetrically distort or obliterate the uterine cavity
[5] as was noted in our patient
In conclusion, fibroid degeneration with varying degree of liquefaction
may simulate a hydrometra on CT. Recognizing the CT features on both hyaline
degenerated fibroid and hydrometra are important.� The application of 3D MPR,
we believe can improve interpretation and diagnostic accuracy of CT.
REFERENCES
-
Walsh JW. Computed tomography of gynecologic neoplasms. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30(4):817-30.
[Medline]
-
Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK, et al. Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics 1999;19(5):1179-97.
[Medline]
-
Bennett GL, Slywotzky CM, Giovanniello G. Gynecologic causes of acute pelvic pain: spectrum of CT findings. Radiographics 2002;22(4):785-801.
[Medline]
-
Langer JE, Dinsmore BJ. Computed tomographic evaluation of benign and inflammatory disorders of the female pelvis. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30(4):831-42.
[Medline]
-
Choi JI, Kim SH, Seong CK, et al. Recurrent uterine cervical carcinoma: spectrum of imaging findings. Korean J Radiol 2000;1(4):198-207.
[Medline]
-
Okizuka H, Sugimura K, Takemori M, et al. MR detection of degenerating uterine leiomyomas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17(5):760-6.
[Medline]
Received 20 October 2005; received in revised form 26 July 2006; accepted 11 August 2006
Correspondence: Department of Biomedical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tel: +603-79492069; Fax: +603-79581973;
E-mail: tokch@ummc.edu.my (Chung-Hong Tok).
Please cite as: Tok CH, Bux SI, Mohamad SI, Lim BK,
Degenerated uterine fibroid mimicking hydrametra: fallacy in CT, Biomed Imaging Interv J 2006; 2(4):e42
<URL: http://www.biij.org/2006/4/e42/>
This article has been viewed 23544 times.
|
|
 |


|